linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] doc: add a couple fixups for IIO ABI files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87zgwg2m6t.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 10:09:14 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] doc: add a couple fixups for IIO ABI files

Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> writes:

> On Tue, 25 May 2021 14:23:51 +0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Patch 1 was already submitted as patch 10/10 on this series:
>> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/87wnrtnpko.fsf@meer.lwn.net/
>> 
>> However, it generated a new warning, due to a separate issue.
>> 
>> So, resend it together with a warning fix patch.
>> 
>> As these patches are independent from the other ones, I guess it
>> can either be applied via IIO or via docs tree, whatever works
>> best for the doc and IIO maintainers.
>> So, I should leave such decision to Jonathan & Jonathan ;-)
>
> Either works for me, but on basis I got here first.
>
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
>
> Jon, if you'd prefer I picked these up, then let me know.

I've applied them, thanks; I took the liberty of fixing the spelling of
"specify" in the second one :)

jon