[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c017049e2abc746eec80deb0768744d5b94cd3e1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 19:38:27 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] slub: Actually use 'message' in restore_bytes()
On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 22:32 -0400, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Joe Perches (2021-05-25 00:37:45)
> > On Sun, 2021-05-23 at 22:12 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 May 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > > > The message argument isn't used here. Let's pass the string to the
> > > > printk message so that the developer can figure out what's happening,
> > > > instead of guessing that a redzone is being restored, etc.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> >
> > Ideally, the slab_fix function would be marked with __printf and the
> > format here would not use \n as that's emitted by the slab_fix.
>
> Thanks. I can make this into a proper patch and author it from you. Can
> you provide a signed-off-by? The restore_bytes() hunk is slightly
> different but I can fix that up.
If you want...
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> > ---
> > mm/slub.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index ee51857d8e9bc..46f9b043089b6 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ static void slab_bug(struct kmem_cache *s, char *fmt, ...)
> > va_end(args);
> > }
> >
> > +__printf(2, 3)
> > static void slab_fix(struct kmem_cache *s, char *fmt, ...)
> > {
> > struct va_format vaf;
> > @@ -816,7 +817,8 @@ static void init_object(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object, u8 val)
> > static void restore_bytes(struct kmem_cache *s, char *message, u8 data,
> > void *from, void *to)
> > {
> > - slab_fix(s, "Restoring %s 0x%px-0x%px=0x%x\n", message, from, to - 1, data);
> > + slab_fix(s, "Restoring %s 0x%px-0x%px=0x%x",
> > + message, from, to - 1, data);
> > memset(from, data, to - from);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1069,13 +1071,13 @@ static int on_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, void *search)
> > slab_err(s, page, "Wrong number of objects. Found %d but should be %d",
> > page->objects, max_objects);
> > page->objects = max_objects;
> > - slab_fix(s, "Number of objects adjusted.");
> > + slab_fix(s, "Number of objects adjusted");
> > }
> > if (page->inuse != page->objects - nr) {
> > slab_err(s, page, "Wrong object count. Counter is %d but counted were %d",
> > page->inuse, page->objects - nr);
> > page->inuse = page->objects - nr;
> > - slab_fix(s, "Object count adjusted.");
> > + slab_fix(s, "Object count adjusted");
> > }
> > return search == NULL;
> > }
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists