[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtWgCyK+W9PMSFzyuPBvBzeKZRE5t7vKzgUQK3bj0NVi9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 10:41:11 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
"fam.zheng@...edance.com" <fam.zheng@...edance.com>,
"Singh, Balbir" <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge
the LRU pages
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 1:35 AM Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:20:47AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:17 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Muchun!
> > >
> > > It looks like the writeback problem will be solved in a different way, which will not require generalization of the obj_cgroup api to the cgroup level. It’s not fully confirmed yet though. We still might wanna do this generalization lingn-term, but as now I have no objections for continuing the work on your patchset. I’m on pto this week, but will take a deeper look at your patches early next week. Sorry for the delay.
> >
> > Waiting on your review. Thanks Roman.
>
> It looks like the mm tree went ahead and I can't clearly apply the whole patchset.
> Would you mind to rebase it and resend?
Got it. Will do that. Thanks.
>
> Thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists