[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210527164517.GA143281@hyeyoo>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 01:45:17 +0900
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: usbmouse: Avoid GFP_ATOMIC when GFP_KERNEL is
possible
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:57:43PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> probe in usb don't need to be atomic. So GFP_KERNEL can be used here,
> instead of GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> index 073127e65ac1..c89332017d5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int usb_mouse_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_i
> if (!mouse || !input_dev)
> goto fail1;
>
> - mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &mouse->data_dma);
> + mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_KERNEL, &mouse->data_dma);
> if (!mouse->data)
> goto fail1;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Hello for me it was simple and obvious patch.
Is there something wrong about it?
Then please let me know about it!
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists