linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] HID: usbmouse: Avoid GFP_ATOMIC when GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YK/Or91JIpbpwWjL@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 18:54:07 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: usbmouse: Avoid GFP_ATOMIC when GFP_KERNEL is
 possible

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:45:17AM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:57:43PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > probe in usb don't need to be atomic. So GFP_KERNEL can be used here,
> > instead of GFP_ATOMIC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> > index 073127e65ac1..c89332017d5d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int usb_mouse_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_i
> >  	if (!mouse || !input_dev)
> >  		goto fail1;
> >  
> > -	mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &mouse->data_dma);
> > +	mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_KERNEL, &mouse->data_dma);
> >  	if (!mouse->data)
> >  		goto fail1;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> 
> Hello for me it was simple and obvious patch.
> Is there something wrong about it?

It has been only 4 days.  For a non-bugfix and for something that is
only a "cleanup" change, give it at least 2 weeks please.

Relax, there is no rush for stuff like this.

thanks,

greg k-h