[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210527090422.GA30378@techsingularity.net>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 10:04:22 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Hritik Vijay <hritikxx8@...il.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Net <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Work around a pahole limitation with
zero-sized struct pagesets
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 09:04:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 09:07:41AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > + !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC) && \
> > + !defined(CONFIG_PAHOLE_HAS_ZEROSIZE_PERCPU_SUPPORT)
> > + /*
> > + * pahole 1.21 and earlier gets confused by zero-sized per-CPU
> > + * variables and produces invalid BTF. Ensure that
> > + * sizeof(struct pagesets) != 0 for older versions of pahole.
> > + */
> > + char __pahole_hack;
> > + #warning "pahole too old to support zero-sized struct pagesets"
> > +#endif
>
> Err, hell no. We should not mess up the kernel for broken tools that
> are not relevant to the kernel build itself ever.
What do you suggest as an alternative?
I added Arnaldo to the cc as he tagged the last released version of
pahole (1.21) and may be able to tag a 1.22 with Andrii's fix for pahole
included.
The most obvious alternative fix for this issue is to require pahole
1.22 to set CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF but obviously a version 1.22 that works
needs to exist first and right now it does not. I'd be ok with this but
users of DEBUG_INFO_BTF may object given that it'll be impossible to set
the option until there is a release.
The second alternative fix is to embed the local_lock
within struct per_cpu_pages. It was shown this was possible in
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/20210419141341.26047-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net/T/#md1001d7af52ac0d6d214b95e98fe051f9399de64
but I dropped it because it makes the locking protocol complex e.g.
config-specific lock-switchin in free_unref_page_list.
The last one is wrapping local_lock behind #defines and only defining the
per-cpu structures when local_lock_t is a non-zero size. That is simply
too ugly for words, the locking patterns should always be the same.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists