[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YK9hwV8DaC+d4OvV@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 12:09:21 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Gowtham Tammana <g-tammana@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
bcousson@...libre.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nisanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: dra7: Fix duplicate USB4 target module node
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com> [210527 09:03]:
> On 27/05/2021 08:48, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > But let's keep the target-module@...000 here as it puts it in the right
> > location rather than directly on the ocp. Let's mark it with
> > status = "disabled" in dra7-l4.dtsi, and add a comment noting it's only
> > available on dra74x. So similar to what you had in your v1 patch, except
> > disabled.
>
> My preference would be not to mix SoC variant specific modules in common module,
> and fix dra74x instead by placing usb4 node in proper place:
>
> &l4_per3 { /* 0x48800000 */
> segment@0 {
> -->
Yeah that's even better, and leaves out status = "disabled".
Sounds good to me.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists