[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLDJy5NE+xKmGL21@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:45:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Amireddy Mallikarjuna reddy <mallikarjunax.reddy@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Marek BehĂșn <marek.behun@....cz>,
Abanoub Sameh <abanoubsameh8@...il.com>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/28] leds: el15203000: Give better margin for
usleep_range()
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:04:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2021-05-10 12:50:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 1 microsecond with 20 millisecond parameter is too low margin for
> > usleep_range(). Give 100 to make scheduler happier.
> >
> > While at it, fix indentation in cases where EL_FW_DELAY_USEC is in use.
> > In the loop, move it to the end to avoid a conditional.
>
> Its not like unhappy schedulers are problem...
Any hints then? To me it sounds like torturing scheduler is the real problem
and that's why scheduler is unhappy.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists