linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCiV5LMoXBQVdSsvNq-vurFVVd4aVWW-C=8Tza8uJTCjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 May 2021 16:24:22 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle

On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 14:54, Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al> wrote:
>
> This fixes an issue where fairness is decreased since cfs_rq's can
> end up not being decayed properly. For two sibling control groups with
> the same priority, this can often lead to a load ratio of 99/1 (!!).
>
> This happen because when a cfs_rq is throttled, all the descendant cfs_rq's
> will be removed from the leaf list. When they initial cfs_rq is
> unthrottled, it will currently only re add descendant cfs_rq's if they
> have one or more entities enqueued. This is not a perfect heuristic.

What would be the other condition in addition to the current one
:cfs_rq->nr_running >= 1 ?
We need to add a cfs_rq in the list if it still contributes to the
tg->load_avg and the split of the share. Can't we add a condition for
this instead of adding a new field ?

>
> This fix change this behavior to save what cfs_rq's was removed from the
> list, and readds them properly on unthrottle.
>
> Can often lead to sutiations like this for equally weighted control
> groups:
>
> $ ps u -C stress
> USER         PID %CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME COMMAND
> root       10009 88.8  0.0   3676   100 pts/1    R+   11:04   0:13 stress --cpu 1
> root       10023  3.0  0.0   3676   104 pts/1    R+   11:04   0:00 stress --cpu 1
>
> Fixes: 31bc6aeaab1d ("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()")
> Signed-off-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c  | 11 ++++++-----
>  kernel/sched/sched.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index ceda53c2a87a..e7423d658389 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -376,7 +376,8 @@ static inline bool list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>         return false;
>  }
>
> -static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +/* Returns 1 if cfs_rq was present in the list and removed */
> +static inline bool list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
>         if (cfs_rq->on_list) {
>                 struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> @@ -393,7 +394,9 @@ static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>
>                 list_del_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
>                 cfs_rq->on_list = 0;
> +               return 1;
>         }
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  static inline void assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(struct rq *rq)
> @@ -4742,9 +4745,7 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
>         if (!cfs_rq->throttle_count) {
>                 cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_task(rq) -
>                                              cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
> -
> -               /* Add cfs_rq with already running entity in the list */
> -               if (cfs_rq->nr_running >= 1)
> +               if (cfs_rq->insert_on_unthrottle)
>                         list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>         }
>
> @@ -4759,7 +4760,7 @@ static int tg_throttle_down(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
>         /* group is entering throttled state, stop time */
>         if (!cfs_rq->throttle_count) {
>                 cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_task(rq);
> -               list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
> +               cfs_rq->insert_on_unthrottle = list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>         }
>         cfs_rq->throttle_count++;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index a189bec13729..12a707d99ee6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
>         u64                     throttled_clock_task_time;
>         int                     throttled;
>         int                     throttle_count;
> +       int                     insert_on_unthrottle;
>         struct list_head        throttled_list;
>  #endif /* CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH */
>  #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
> --
> 2.31.1
>