linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: Support few custom operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMpxmJVJAX8jPrYg3=jkG4JqEEnUfpexfn+cFKWJQYpdRJaRUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 May 2021 16:31:39 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc:     "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
        "bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "michael@...le.cc" <michael@...le.cc>,
        "noltari@...il.com" <noltari@...il.com>,
        "jonas.gorski@...il.com" <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: Support few custom operations

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:33 AM Vaittinen, Matti
<Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
>

[snip]

> >
> > What makes things easy for me to maintain is active and happy
> > driver maintainers, so it is paramount that the file looks to Michael
> > like something he wants to keep maintaining. This removes work
> > from me and Bartosz.
>
> I agree. When someone takes care of a driver, he should be happy with
> it. Period. And thanks to Michael for writing this driver and reviewing
> the patches. Reviewing is hard work.
>
> On the other hand, I don't enjoy writing code I am unhappy with either.
> And as this particular piece of code is not a paid task for me, I do
> this for fun. gpio-regmap is not mandatory for my drivers now. So, I'll
> just opt-out from this change. I'll happily use the gpio-regmap where
> it fits, when it fits.
>

I take it that path 2/3 is still good to go?

Bart

[snip]