linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: Support few custom operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <93578f0271fba68429f911c74acc1b7bd5610644.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 May 2021 15:42:49 +0000
From:   "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     "bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
CC:     "bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
        "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jonas.gorski@...il.com" <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
        "noltari@...il.com" <noltari@...il.com>,
        "michael@...le.cc" <michael@...le.cc>,
        "andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: Support few custom operations

Hi Bartosz,

On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 16:31 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:33 AM Vaittinen, Matti
> <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > > What makes things easy for me to maintain is active and happy
> > > driver maintainers, so it is paramount that the file looks to
> > > Michael
> > > like something he wants to keep maintaining. This removes work
> > > from me and Bartosz.
> > 
> > I agree. When someone takes care of a driver, he should be happy
> > with
> > it. Period. And thanks to Michael for writing this driver and
> > reviewing
> > the patches. Reviewing is hard work.
> > 
> > On the other hand, I don't enjoy writing code I am unhappy with
> > either.
> > And as this particular piece of code is not a paid task for me, I
> > do
> > this for fun. gpio-regmap is not mandatory for my drivers now. So,
> > I'll
> > just opt-out from this change. I'll happily use the gpio-regmap
> > where
> > it fits, when it fits.
> > 
> 
> I take it that path 2/3 is still good to go?

I don't think it had explicit ack from Michael yet - but I think it was
not objected either. I can respin it alone if needed but would help me
if you just pick it from this series (assuming it's Ok for others).

Best Regards
	Matti Vaittinen