[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dce05205de61abae035ddf3629584ce851ad56e3.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 07:42:03 +0000
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: "michael@...le.cc" <michael@...le.cc>
CC: "bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"jonas.gorski@...il.com" <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
"noltari@...il.com" <noltari@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: Support few custom operations
On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 19:23 +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Matti,
>
> Am 2021-05-28 17:42, schrieb Vaittinen, Matti:
> > Hi Bartosz,
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 16:31 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:33 AM Vaittinen, Matti
> > > <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I take it that path 2/3 is still good to go?
> >
> > I don't think it had explicit ack from Michael yet - but I think it
> > was
> > not objected either. I can respin it alone if needed but would help
> > me
> > if you just pick it from this series (assuming it's Ok for others).
>
> Just sent my R-b.
>
> I'd pick the removal of the gpio_regmap_set_drvdata(), too. If you're
> fine with it I'd submit a new patch with just that.
Right. Besides the 2/3 might require the 1/3 to apply cleanly. I
somehow thought I sent the devm_add_action_or_reset() as first change
in the series.
Feel free to rework the patches as the best fits your purposes :)
Best Regards
Matti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists