[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202106011555.A7E9BE38@keescook>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 15:55:31 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: jarmo.tiitto@...il.com
Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pgo: rename the raw profile file to vmlinux.profraw
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:40:25AM +0300, jarmo.tiitto@...il.com wrote:
> Yes, my future intention is that there will be one *.profraw file per module.
> And curiously I would also have renamed the current profile data file to
> "vmlinux.profraw" to disambiguate it from what part of kernel generated it.
>
> I already wrote an small fix up that I think should be part of the upstream
> code so that profiling the vmlinux works better.
> It filters out any module originated content from vmlinux.profraw.
>
> Above will be probably a good exercise for me.
>
> Next, my future v2 module profiling machinery
> would probably follow on top of your work.
Okay, great; thanks for digging into it! :)
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists