linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Count rlimits in each user namespace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 02 Jun 2021 15:37:32 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     legion@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Count rlimits in each user namespace

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:27:07 +0200 legion@...nel.org wrote:
>
>> These patches are for binding the rlimit counters to a user in user namespace.
>
> It's at v11 and no there has been no acking or reviewing activity?  Or
> have you not been tracking these?

Most of the reviews were noticing things that needed to be changed.

For the ack/review by tags I am the one reviewing it and merging the
change so I guess I didn't give Alex any Acked-by or Reviewed-by
tags.

Regardless the changes are sitting in linux-next now and seem to be
doing fine.

Eric