linux-kernel - [PATCH wq/for-next 2/2] workqueue: clean up for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  2 Jun 2021 13:16:55 +0200
From:   Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH wq/for-next 2/2] workqueue: clean up for_each_pwq()'s documentation

The if/else clause was removed with commit 5a6446626d7e
("workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check").

Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 8a700ccfa313..104e3ef04e33 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -418,9 +418,6 @@ static void show_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq);
  * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or RCU read locked.
  * If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
  * responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
- *
- * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be
- * ignored.
  */
 #define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)						\
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node,		\
-- 
2.25.1