[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ESvSq0tQ6RgG4pGNwnmAG4jf38xY8Uhg6hL-MBsU0nRE_rXmW_musHce9lnlWWKxkPMAnuH1Yg6o0V1lpO-RWlT7BktnvJEnQoYApKHIe48=@emersion.fr>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 19:35:35 +0000
From: Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: adds NOSIGBUS extension for out-of-band shmem read
On Thursday, June 3rd, 2021 at 9:24 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> I don’t understand the use case well enough to comment on whether MAP_PRIVATE
> is sufficient, but I’m with Hugh: if this feature is implemented for
> MAP_SHARED, it should be fully coherent.
I've tried to explain what we'd need from user-space PoV in [1].
tl;dr the MAP_PRIVATE restriction would get us pretty far, even if it
won't allow us to have all of the bells and whistles.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/vs1Us2sm4qmfvLOqNat0-r16GyfmWzqUzQ4KHbXJwEcjhzeoQ4sBTxx7QXDG9B6zk5AeT7FsNb3CSr94LaKy6Novh1fbbw8D_BBxYsbPLms=@emersion.fr/T/#mb321a8d39e824740877ba95f1df780ffd52c3862
Powered by blists - more mailing lists