linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] virtio: Force only split mode with protected guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3159e1f4-77cd-e071-b6f2-a2bb83cfc69a@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:53:43 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, mst@...hat.com
Cc:     jasowang@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] virtio: Force only split mode with protected guest


> Tell that to every crypto downgrade attack ever.

That's exactly what this patch addresses.

>
> I see two credible solutions:
>
> 1. Actually harden the virtio driver.
That's exactly what this patchkit, and the alternative approaches, like 
Jason's, are doing.
>
> 2. Have a new virtio-modern driver and use it for modern use cases. Maybe rename the old driver virtio-legacy or virtio-insecure.  They can share code.

In most use cases the legacy driver is not insecure because there is no 
memory protection anyways.

Yes maybe such a split would be a good idea for maintenance and maybe 
performance reasons, but at least from the security perspective I don't 
see any need for it.

>
> Another snag you may hit: virtio’s heuristic for whether to use proper DMA ops or to bypass them is a giant kludge. I’m very slightly optimistic that getting the heuristic wrong will make the driver fail to operate but won’t allow the host to take over the guest, but I’m not really convinced. And I wrote that code!  A virtio-modern mode probably should not have a heuristic, and the various iommu-bypassing modes should be fixed to work at the bus level, not the device level

TDX and SEV use the arch hook to enforce DMA API, so that part is also 
solved.


-Andi