linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: Advertise encrypted casefolding in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YLlj+h4RiT6FvyK6@sol.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 3 Jun 2021 16:21:30 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>
Cc:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: Advertise encrypted casefolding in sysfs

On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:50:38AM +0000, Daniel Rosenberg wrote:
> Older kernels don't support encryption with casefolding. This adds
> the sysfs entry encrypted_casefold to show support for those combined
> features. Support for this feature was originally added by
> commit 7ad08a58bf67 ("f2fs: Handle casefolding with Encryption")
> 
> Fixes: 7ad08a58bf67 ("f2fs: Handle casefolding with Encryption")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.11+
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> index 09e3f258eb52..6604291a3cdf 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> @@ -161,6 +161,9 @@ static ssize_t features_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>  	if (f2fs_sb_has_compression(sbi))
>  		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%s%s",
>  				len ? ", " : "", "compression");
> +	if (f2fs_sb_has_casefold(sbi) && f2fs_sb_has_encrypt(sbi))
> +		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%s%s",
> +				len ? ", " : "", "encrypted_casefold");
>  	len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%s%s",
>  				len ? ", " : "", "pin_file");
>  	len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "\n");
> @@ -579,6 +582,7 @@ enum feat_id {
>  	FEAT_CASEFOLD,
>  	FEAT_COMPRESSION,
>  	FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2,
> +	FEAT_ENCRYPTED_CASEFOLD,
>  };

Actually looking at it more closely, this patch is wrong.

It only makes sense to declare "encrypted_casefold" as a feature of the
filesystem implementation, i.e. /sys/fs/f2fs/features/encrypted_casefold.

It does *not* make sense to declare it as a feature of a particular filesystem
instance, i.e. /sys/fs/f2fs/$disk/features, as it is already implied by the
filesystem instance having both the encryption and casefold features enabled.

Can we add /sys/fs/f2fs/features/encrypted_casefold only?

- Eric