[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MW4PR21MB2004EB3380731C8102DB7D16C03C9@MW4PR21MB2004.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 01:28:08 +0000
From: Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>
To: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
"viremana@...ux.microsoft.com" <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Lillian Grassin-Drake <Lillian.GrassinDrake@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 03/19] drivers/hv: minimal mshv module (/dev/mshv/)
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/Kconfig b/drivers/hv/Kconfig
> index 66c794d92391..d618b1fab2bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hv/Kconfig
> @@ -27,4 +27,22 @@ config HYPERV_BALLOON
> help
> Select this option to enable Hyper-V Balloon driver.
>
> +config HYPERV_ROOT_API
A more suitable place to put this would be under the "VIRTUALIZATION"
config menu option, where we have the "KVM" option today.
> + tristate "Microsoft Hypervisor root partition interfaces: /dev/mshv"
> + depends on HYPERV
> + help
> + Provides access to interfaces for managing guest virtual machines
> + running under the Microsoft Hypervisor.
These are technically not "root" interfaces. As you say it too, these are
interfaces to manage guest VMs. Calling it "HYPERV_ROOT_API" would
be confusing. Something along the lines of "HYPERV_VMM_API" or
"HYPERV_VM_API" seems more appropriate to me.
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c68cc84fb983
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/hv/mshv_main.c
Why not in /virt/hv or something under /virt?
> +static int mshv_dev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp);
> +static int mshv_dev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp);
> +static long mshv_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
Do we need to have both 'mshv' & 'dev' in the name? How about just
calling these 'mshv_xyz'? Like you have for init/exit.
> +
> +static struct miscdevice mshv_dev = {
> + .minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
> + .name = "mshv",
> + .fops = &mshv_dev_fops,
> + .mode = 600,
> +};
For the default mode, I think we want to keep it the same as that for 'kvm'.
- Sunil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists