[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <149a2760-48f5-25ef-30f4-d5d1135b531e@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:27:22 -0700
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/8] x86/fpu: Mop up XSAVES and related damage
On 6/4/2021 7:05 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02 2021 at 14:28, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>> On 6/2/2021 2:55 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> With the series applied, glibc pkey test fails sometimes. I will try to
>> find out the cause.
>
> That fails not sometimes. It fails always due to patch 7/8. The reason
> is that before that patch fpu__clear_all() reinitialized the hardware
> which includes writing the initial PKRU value.
>
> But fpu__initialize() does not store the initial PKRU value in the
> task's xstate which breaks PKRU. As that patch is not urgent we can
> postpone it for not.
>
> But looking at the above, it's not clear to me why that PKRU stuff works
> at all (upstream), but I'll figure it out eventually. I'm quite sure
> that it does work by pure chance not by design.
>
Thanks for the update. I will continue looking at it.
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists