linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/42] PCI: aardvark: Check for virq mapping when processing INTx IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87o8clzj7z.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 04 Jun 2021 17:29:36 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
        Remi Pommarel <repk@...plefau.lt>, Xogium <contact@...ium.me>,
        Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn505@...il.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/42] PCI: aardvark: Check for virq mapping when processing INTx IRQ

On Fri, 04 Jun 2021 17:24:51 +0100,
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Friday 07 May 2021 10:15:39 Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 May 2021 16:31:23 +0100,
> > Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > It is possible that we receive spurious INTx interrupt. So add needed check
> > > before calling generic_handle_irq() function.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c | 5 ++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > > index 362faddae935..e7089db11f79 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > > @@ -1106,7 +1106,10 @@ static void advk_pcie_handle_int(struct advk_pcie *pcie)
> > >  			    PCIE_ISR1_REG);
> > >  
> > >  		virq = irq_find_mapping(pcie->irq_domain, i);
> > > -		generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > > +		if (virq)
> > > +			generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > > +		else
> > > +			dev_err(&pcie->pdev->dev, "unexpected INT%c IRQ\n", (char)i+'A');
> > 
> > Please don't scream like this. This is the best way to get into a DoS
> > situation if you interrupt rate is high enough. At least rate-limit
> > it.
> 
> Ok, I will fix it!
> 
> Just to note that this code pattern is used also in other drivers.
> So other drivers should fixed too...

"We should fix the kernel" is a common theme. Please go ahead.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.