lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 06 Jun 2021 08:49:52 +0200
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: Remove conditions with no effects

On Sunday, June 6, 2021 7:56:32 AM CEST Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 06:35 +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Removed conditions with no effects. Detected by Coccinelle.
> 
> It's be good if you researched how this came to be and noted it
> in the changelog.
> 
> try:
> 
> commit dc365d2cc579200bc3752ddb941e046e3a16962c
> Author: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
> Date:   Tue Mar 16 15:04:11 2021 +0100
> 
>     staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused code blocks conditioned by never set
> CONFIG_AP_WOWLAN
>
I've just read the commit you pointed out. It seems that the conditions with 
no effects came out while removing code that was conditionally compiled by the 
unused definition CONFIG_AP_WOWLAN.

However, I don't understand why those "conditions with no effects" have been 
left there. 

Now I'm not sure of what you asked me to do: should I leave them there as they 
are (perhaps because I missed something) or should I explain in my patch that 
they were overlooked by commit dc365d2cc579?

Thanks in advance,

Fabio



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ