[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210607104248.17035-1-nanich.lee@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 19:42:48 +0900
From: Changheun Lee <nanich.lee@...sung.com>
To: hch@...radead.org
Cc: Johannes.Thumshirn@....com, alex_y_xu@...oo.ca,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, asml.silence@...il.com,
avri.altman@....com, axboe@...nel.dk, bgoncalv@...hat.com,
bvanassche@....org, cang@...eaurora.org, damien.lemoal@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jaegeuk@...nel.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
jisoo2146.oh@...sung.com, junho89.kim@...sung.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
ming.lei@...hat.com, mj0123.lee@...sung.com,
nanich.lee@...sung.com, osandov@...com, patchwork-bot@...nel.org,
seunghwan.hyun@...sung.com, sookwan7.kim@...sung.com,
tj@...nel.org, tom.leiming@...il.com, woosung2.lee@...sung.com,
yi.zhang@...hat.com, yt0928.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/3] bio: control bio max size
> NAK. As discussed countless time we already have an actual limit.
> And we can look it as advisory before building ever bigger bios,
> but the last thing we need is yet another confusing limit.
Thank you for your review and feedback. I has thought proper bio size control
with proper interface might be good, and can be helpful to the other module
beside issued performance problem. Providing of common interface to control
bio size in block layer might be good I think even though current patch is
not accepted.
Thanks for all,
Changheun Lee
Powered by blists - more mailing lists