[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db0b921442d76ab64c52330a50664efd6d37c311.camel@svanheule.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 13:12:01 +0200
From: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: mdio: Reject invalid clause-22 addresses
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 12:03 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > Currently a regmap configuration for regmap-mdio must have a register
> > address width of 5 bits (cf. clause-22 register access). This is not
> > enforced on the provided register addresses, which would enable
> > clause-45 MDIO bus access, if the right bit packing is used.
>
> Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes
> it hard to follow what's going on and what the current state of things
> is and makes it easy for things to get missed when threads get cleaned
> out.
Sorry, my bad. I usually have an updated cover letter in between updated
patches, but this was only one patch. I'll include a LKML-link to the previous
version(s) in the future, to keep an easy reference around.
Best,
Sander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists