lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:35:05 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        wsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend v1 1/3] units: Add SI metric prefix definitions

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 05:24:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 03:33:31PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On 6/3/21 7:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Sometimes it's useful to have well-defined SI metric prefix to be used
> > > to self-describe the formulas or equations.
> > > 
> > > List most popular ones in the units.h.
> 
> ...
> 
> > > +/* Metric prefixes in accordance with Système international (d'unités) */
> > > +#define PETA	1000000000000000LL
> > > +#define TERA	1000000000000LL
> > > +#define GIGA	1000000000L
> > > +#define MEGA	1000000L
> > > +#define KILO	1000L
> > > +#define HECTO	100L
> > > +#define DECA	10L
> > > +#define DECI	10L
> > > +#define CENTI	100L
> > > +#define MILLI	1000L
> > > +#define MICRO	1000000L
> > > +#define NANO	1000000000L
> > > +#define PICO	1000000000000LL
> > > +#define FEMTO	1000000000000000LL
> > 
> > For me milli is always 1/1000.
> 
> For me as well. Kernel does not operate with float point numbers.
> That's why it's ordered like this.
> 
> > Might lead to confusion with these defines if
> > idea is to multiply with KILO but divide with MILLI?
> 
> If the author of the hypothetical driver doesn't understand this, maybe
> they can ask first, but I am an optimist here and I assume that whoever
> writes the driver for a sensor / etc has a minimum education to see
> what's needed for the certain case.

Writing this, I think that I'm not so educated :-)

What we have in I²C case is kHz * ns = 10^3 * 10^-9, so we need to divide by
10^-6 to normalize the numbers. Sounds like MICRO is the correct thing to use
there.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ