[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YL+dTtsCtZjMeZWn@blackbook>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:39:42 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on
unthrottle
Hello.
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 12:23:14PM +0200, Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al> wrote:
> @@ -4719,8 +4738,8 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
> cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_task(rq) -
> cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
>
> - /* Add cfs_rq with already running entity in the list */
> - if (cfs_rq->nr_running >= 1)
> + /* Add cfs_rq with load or one or more already running entities to the list */
> + if (!cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq) || cfs_rq->nr_running)
> list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
> }
Can there be a decayed cfs_rq with positive nr_running?
I.e. can the condition be simplified to just the decayed check?
(I'm looking at account_entity_enqueue() but I don't know if an entity's
weight can be zero in some singular cases.)
Thanks,
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists