linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBEZZo9fHDxe7viLyZmCe=4NTLLtBFyWM_UuJ1nmqxGvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:49:39 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc:     Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle

On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 18:39, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 12:23:14PM +0200, Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al> wrote:
>
> > @@ -4719,8 +4738,8 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
> >               cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_task(rq) -
> >                                            cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
> >
> > -             /* Add cfs_rq with already running entity in the list */
> > -             if (cfs_rq->nr_running >= 1)
> > +             /* Add cfs_rq with load or one or more already running entities to the list */
> > +             if (!cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq) || cfs_rq->nr_running)
> >                       list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
> >       }
>
> Can there be a decayed cfs_rq with positive nr_running?
> I.e. can the condition be simplified to just the decayed check?

Yes, nothing prevent a task with a null load to be enqueued on a
throttle cfs as an example

>
> (I'm looking at account_entity_enqueue() but I don't know if an entity's
> weight can be zero in some singular cases.)
>
> Thanks,
> Michal