lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:32:18 -0400
From:   Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, robert.foss@...aro.org,
        andrey.konovalov@...aro.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "open list:QUALCOMM CAMERA SUBSYSTEM DRIVER" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Add
 qcom,sm8250-camss binding

On 6/9/21 6:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 06:35:06PM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote:
>> Add bindings for qcom,sm8250-camss in order to support the camera
>> subsystem for SM8250.

...

>> +    items:
>> +      - const: csiphy0
>> +      - const: csiphy1
>> +      - const: csiphy2
>> +      - const: csiphy3
>> +      - const: csiphy4
>> +      - const: csiphy5
> 
> Should be separate phy nodes? Same/similar DPHY or CPHY as QCom DSI PHY?
> 

This is not a new driver, this series only adds support for a new SoC - 
the design has already been decided (and this binding is similar to 
qcom,sdm845-camss.yaml).

The hardware supports D-PHY and C-PHY, but the driver isn't aware of 
this and assumes D-PHY. sdm845 and msm8996 hardware also support C-PHY, 
so it isn't a problem specific to this series.

>> +      - const: vfe0
>> +      - const: vfe1
>> +      - const: vfe_lite0
>> +      - const: vfe_lite1
>> +

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ