[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df0750af-74a9-9bc3-a7ec-96efba248aa1@marek.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:32:18 -0400
From: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, robert.foss@...aro.org,
andrey.konovalov@...aro.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM CAMERA SUBSYSTEM DRIVER"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Add
qcom,sm8250-camss binding
On 6/9/21 6:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 06:35:06PM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote:
>> Add bindings for qcom,sm8250-camss in order to support the camera
>> subsystem for SM8250.
...
>> + items:
>> + - const: csiphy0
>> + - const: csiphy1
>> + - const: csiphy2
>> + - const: csiphy3
>> + - const: csiphy4
>> + - const: csiphy5
>
> Should be separate phy nodes? Same/similar DPHY or CPHY as QCom DSI PHY?
>
This is not a new driver, this series only adds support for a new SoC -
the design has already been decided (and this binding is similar to
qcom,sdm845-camss.yaml).
The hardware supports D-PHY and C-PHY, but the driver isn't aware of
this and assumes D-PHY. sdm845 and msm8996 hardware also support C-PHY,
so it isn't a problem specific to this series.
>> + - const: vfe0
>> + - const: vfe1
>> + - const: vfe_lite0
>> + - const: vfe_lite1
>> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists