[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1016d48a-a276-f7b0-49a8-4571f4f75a61@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:53:27 +1000 (AEST)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
Richard Zidlicky <rz@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated
m68k IDE drivers
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> please note that Finn's patch depends on one of mine currently under review.
> Without that one, Q40 support may break in certain cases.
>
AFAIK, that's only true for a configuration that enables both CONFIG_Q40
and CONFIG_ATARI. In my tests with stock v5.12, such a configuration
presently doesn't work correctly on Atari.
This patch series doesn't make this issue any worse.
Besides, I think it is a non-issue because the problem is so rare that
no-one noticed it before I did, and the workaround for CONFIG_Q40 users is
trivial anyway (disable CONFIG_ATARI).
Is there really some benefit in holding up this patch series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists