[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1099cb5-c83f-d259-d16d-c07e3a3dcdc1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:05:50 +1200
From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
Richard Zidlicky <rz@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated
m68k IDE drivers
Hi Finn,
Am 09.06.2021 um 15:53 schrieb Finn Thain:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
>> please note that Finn's patch depends on one of mine currently under review.
>> Without that one, Q40 support may break in certain cases.
>>
>
> AFAIK, that's only true for a configuration that enables both CONFIG_Q40
> and CONFIG_ATARI. In my tests with stock v5.12, such a configuration
> presently doesn't work correctly on Atari.
>
> This patch series doesn't make this issue any worse.
You're right, it's not a regression (that combination was broken before)
, and there's no patch dependency or conflict either.
> Besides, I think it is a non-issue because the problem is so rare that
> no-one noticed it before I did, and the workaround for CONFIG_Q40 users is
> trivial anyway (disable CONFIG_ATARI).
>
> Is there really some benefit in holding up this patch series?
On second thought - no point in holding this up.
Cheers,
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists