linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 02/10] mm/thp: make is_huge_zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21ea9ca-a1f5-8b90-5e88-95fb1c49bbfa@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Wang Yugui <wangyugui@...-tech.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] mm/thp: make is_huge_zero_pmd() safe and quicker

Most callers of is_huge_zero_pmd() supply a pmd already verified present;
but a few (notably zap_huge_pmd()) do not - it might be a pmd migration
entry, in which the pfn is encoded differently from a present pmd: which
might pass the is_huge_zero_pmd() test (though not on x86, since L1TF
forced us to protect against that); or perhaps even crash in pmd_page()
applied to a swap-like entry.

Make it safe by adding pmd_present() check into is_huge_zero_pmd() itself;
and make it quicker by saving huge_zero_pfn, so that is_huge_zero_pmd()
will not need to do that pmd_page() lookup each time.

__split_huge_pmd_locked() checked pmd_trans_huge() before: that worked,
but is unnecessary now that is_huge_zero_pmd() checks present.

Fixes: e71769ae5260 ("mm: enable thp migration for shmem thp")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
---
Patch added (replacing part of first) since the v1 series was posted.

 include/linux/huge_mm.h | 8 +++++++-
 mm/huge_memory.c        | 5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 9626fda5efce..2a8ebe6c222e 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ struct page *follow_devmap_pud(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, pmd_t orig_pmd);
 
 extern struct page *huge_zero_page;
+extern unsigned long huge_zero_pfn;
 
 static inline bool is_huge_zero_page(struct page *page)
 {
@@ -294,7 +295,7 @@ static inline bool is_huge_zero_page(struct page *page)
 
 static inline bool is_huge_zero_pmd(pmd_t pmd)
 {
-	return is_huge_zero_page(pmd_page(pmd));
+	return READ_ONCE(huge_zero_pfn) == pmd_pfn(pmd) && pmd_present(pmd);
 }
 
 static inline bool is_huge_zero_pud(pud_t pud)
@@ -440,6 +441,11 @@ static inline bool is_huge_zero_page(struct page *page)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static inline bool is_huge_zero_pmd(pmd_t pmd)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 static inline bool is_huge_zero_pud(pud_t pud)
 {
 	return false;
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 42cfefc6e66e..5885c5f5836f 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static struct shrinker deferred_split_shrinker;
 
 static atomic_t huge_zero_refcount;
 struct page *huge_zero_page __read_mostly;
+unsigned long huge_zero_pfn __read_mostly = ~0UL;
 
 bool transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
@@ -98,6 +99,7 @@ static bool get_huge_zero_page(void)
 		__free_pages(zero_page, compound_order(zero_page));
 		goto retry;
 	}
+	WRITE_ONCE(huge_zero_pfn, page_to_pfn(zero_page));
 
 	/* We take additional reference here. It will be put back by shrinker */
 	atomic_set(&huge_zero_refcount, 2);
@@ -147,6 +149,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_huge_zero_page_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&huge_zero_refcount, 1, 0) == 1) {
 		struct page *zero_page = xchg(&huge_zero_page, NULL);
 		BUG_ON(zero_page == NULL);
+		WRITE_ONCE(huge_zero_pfn, ~0UL);
 		__free_pages(zero_page, compound_order(zero_page));
 		return HPAGE_PMD_NR;
 	}
@@ -2071,7 +2074,7 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) && is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd)) {
+	if (is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd)) {
 		/*
 		 * FIXME: Do we want to invalidate secondary mmu by calling
 		 * mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() see comments below inside
-- 
2.26.2