[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZq6XX7zKbdQU1GhaMGvWSC7isO4UoO1iVqs-4An0FQKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:09:38 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@...el.com>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
"open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/11] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Improve probe errors
with dev_err_probe()
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 7:06 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> As I was testing to make sure that the DEFER path worked well with my
> patch series, I got tired of seeing this scary message in my logs just
> because the panel needed to defer:
> [drm:ti_sn_bridge_probe] *ERROR* could not find any panel node
>
> Let's use dev_err_probe() which nicely quiets this error and also
> simplifies the code a tiny bit. We'll also update other places in the
> file which can use dev_err_probe().
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists