[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4e6f928-60c9-a8dc-9999-284c77dc152e@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 06:11:47 -0700
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: hao.wu@...el.com, mdf@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
michal.simek@...inx.com, dinguyen@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, nava.manne@...inx.com,
yilun.xu@...el.com, davidgow@...gle.com, fpacheco@...hat.com,
richard.gong@...el.com, luca@...aceresoli.net,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] fpga: reorganize to subdirs
On 6/9/21 3:00 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:23:33AM -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>
>> The incoming xrt patchset has a toplevel subdir xrt/
>> The current fpga/ uses a single dir with filename prefixes to subdivide owners
>> For consistency, there should be only one way to organize the fpga/ dir.
>> Because the subdir model scales better, refactor to use it.
>> The discussion wrt xrt is here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/68e85a4f-4a10-1ff9-0443-aa565878c855@redhat.com/
>>
>> Follow drivers/net/ethernet/ which has control configs
>> NET_VENDOR_BLA that map to drivers/net/ethernet/bla
>> Since fpgas do not have many vendors, drop the 'VENDOR' and use
>> FPGA_BLA.
> Why did we get two 0/7 emails?
Errr.. no clue,
I'll resend the set.
Tom
> confused,
>
> greg k-h
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists