[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMCRRm/lB2+gfpS9@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:00:38 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: trix@...hat.com
Cc: hao.wu@...el.com, mdf@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
michal.simek@...inx.com, dinguyen@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, nava.manne@...inx.com,
yilun.xu@...el.com, davidgow@...gle.com, fpacheco@...hat.com,
richard.gong@...el.com, luca@...aceresoli.net,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] fpga: reorganize to subdirs
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:23:33AM -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>
> The incoming xrt patchset has a toplevel subdir xrt/
> The current fpga/ uses a single dir with filename prefixes to subdivide owners
> For consistency, there should be only one way to organize the fpga/ dir.
> Because the subdir model scales better, refactor to use it.
> The discussion wrt xrt is here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/68e85a4f-4a10-1ff9-0443-aa565878c855@redhat.com/
>
> Follow drivers/net/ethernet/ which has control configs
> NET_VENDOR_BLA that map to drivers/net/ethernet/bla
> Since fpgas do not have many vendors, drop the 'VENDOR' and use
> FPGA_BLA.
Why did we get two 0/7 emails?
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists