[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210610113827.57db9e77@coco.lan>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 11:38:27 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>
Cc: <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
<mauro.chehab@...wei.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <mchehab@...nel.org>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/25] media: atmel: properly get pm_runtime
Em Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:04:07 +0000
<Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com> escreveu:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c
> >> index fe3ec8d0eaee..ce8e1351fa53 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c
> >> @@ -294,9 +294,13 @@ static int isc_wait_clk_stable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >> static int isc_clk_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >> {
> >> struct isc_clk *isc_clk = to_isc_clk(hw);
> >> + int ret;
> >>
> >> - if (isc_clk->id == ISC_ISPCK)
> >> - pm_runtime_get_sync(isc_clk->dev);
> >> + if (isc_clk->id == ISC_ISPCK) {
> >> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(isc_clk->dev);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
>
> Hi Mauro,
>
> With this patch, the ISC is broken on latest media tree. It looks like
> pm_runtime_resume_and_get for the ISC_ISPCK clock returns -ENOACCESS and
> thus, the probe of the driver fails:
>
> atmel-sama5d2-isc f0008000.isc: failed to enable ispck: -13
> atmel-sama5d2-isc: probe of f0008000.isc failed with error -13
>
>
> Could you point out how I could fix this ? Maybe the isc_clk->dev is not
> properly handled/initialized in some other part of the code ?
Looking at RPM implementation:
static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
{
...
if (dev->power.runtime_error)
retval = -EINVAL;
else if (dev->power.disable_depth == 1 && dev->power.is_suspended
&& dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE)
retval = 1;
else if (dev->power.disable_depth > 0)
retval = -EACCES;
...
It sounds that RPM is disabled for this clock. Did you call
pm_runtime_enable() before calling isc_clk_prepare()?
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists