[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e25d024e-4fa6-dd67-b97a-1d2640f2b560@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 12:00:42 +0000
From: <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>
To: <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
CC: <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
<mauro.chehab@...wei.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <mchehab@...nel.org>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/25] media: atmel: properly get pm_runtime
On 6/10/21 12:38 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Em Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:04:07 +0000
> <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com> escreveu:
>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c
>>>> index fe3ec8d0eaee..ce8e1351fa53 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc-base.c
>>>> @@ -294,9 +294,13 @@ static int isc_wait_clk_stable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>>> static int isc_clk_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>>> {
>>>> struct isc_clk *isc_clk = to_isc_clk(hw);
>>>> + int ret;
>>>>
>>>> - if (isc_clk->id == ISC_ISPCK)
>>>> - pm_runtime_get_sync(isc_clk->dev);
>>>> + if (isc_clk->id == ISC_ISPCK) {
>>>> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(isc_clk->dev);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>
>> Hi Mauro,
>>
>> With this patch, the ISC is broken on latest media tree. It looks like
>> pm_runtime_resume_and_get for the ISC_ISPCK clock returns -ENOACCESS and
>> thus, the probe of the driver fails:
>>
>> atmel-sama5d2-isc f0008000.isc: failed to enable ispck: -13
>> atmel-sama5d2-isc: probe of f0008000.isc failed with error -13
>>
>>
>> Could you point out how I could fix this ? Maybe the isc_clk->dev is not
>> properly handled/initialized in some other part of the code ?
>
> Looking at RPM implementation:
>
> static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
> {
> ...
> if (dev->power.runtime_error)
> retval = -EINVAL;
> else if (dev->power.disable_depth == 1 && dev->power.is_suspended
> && dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE)
> retval = 1;
> else if (dev->power.disable_depth > 0)
> retval = -EACCES;
> ...
>
> It sounds that RPM is disabled for this clock. Did you call
> pm_runtime_enable() before calling isc_clk_prepare()?
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
>
I tried to call pm_runtime_enable for the clk at clk_init time, but
doing that makes the runtime for the ISC fail like this:
atmel-sama5d2-isc f0008000.isc: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists