linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] memory: tegra: Add missing dependencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Jun 2021 19:23:00 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memory: tegra: Add missing dependencies

10.06.2021 18:50, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 10.06.2021 09:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski пишет:
>> The stubs might be good idea anyway, but the driver explicitly needs for
>> runtime working reservedmem, so it should select it.
> 
> The OF and reservedmem are both selected by the ARCH for the runtime
> use. They may not be selected in the case of compile-testing.
> 
> Both OF core and reservedmem provide stubs needed for compile-testing,
> it's only the RESERVEDMEM_OF_DECLARE() that is missing the stub. Adding
> the missing stub should be a more appropriate solution than adding extra
> Kconfig dependencies, IMO.
> 

I will send the patch. If OF maintainers will have objections, then
adding the dependency may become a more reasonable option.