linux-kernel - [patch 09/41] x86/kvm: Avoid looking up PKRU in XSAVE buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 18:15:32 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [patch 09/41] x86/kvm: Avoid looking up PKRU in XSAVE buffer

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

PKRU is being removed from the kernel XSAVE/FPU buffers.  This removal
will probably include warnings for code that look up PKRU in those
buffers.

KVM currently looks up the location of PKRU but doesn't even use the
pointer that it gets back.  Rework the code to avoid calling
get_xsave_addr() except in cases where its result is actually used.

This makes the code more clear and also avoids the inevitable PKRU
warnings.

This is probably a good cleanup and could go upstream idependently
of any PKRU rework.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

---

 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4589,20 +4589,21 @@ static void fill_xsave(u8 *dest, struct
 	 */
 	valid = xstate_bv & ~XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE;
 	while (valid) {
+		u32 size, offset, ecx, edx;
 		u64 xfeature_mask = valid & -valid;
 		int xfeature_nr = fls64(xfeature_mask) - 1;
-		void *src = get_xsave_addr(xsave, xfeature_nr);
+		void *src;
 
-		if (src) {
-			u32 size, offset, ecx, edx;
-			cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, xfeature_nr,
-				    &size, &offset, &ecx, &edx);
-			if (xfeature_nr == XFEATURE_PKRU)
-				memcpy(dest + offset, &vcpu->arch.pkru,
-				       sizeof(vcpu->arch.pkru));
-			else
-				memcpy(dest + offset, src, size);
+		cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, xfeature_nr,
+			    &size, &offset, &ecx, &edx);
 
+		if (xfeature_nr == XFEATURE_PKRU) {
+			memcpy(dest + offset, &vcpu->arch.pkru,
+			       sizeof(vcpu->arch.pkru));
+		} else {
+			src = get_xsave_addr(xsave, xfeature_nr);
+			if (src)
+				memcpy(dest + offset, src, size);
 		}
 
 		valid -= xfeature_mask;
@@ -4632,18 +4633,20 @@ static void load_xsave(struct kvm_vcpu *
 	 */
 	valid = xstate_bv & ~XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE;
 	while (valid) {
+		u32 size, offset, ecx, edx;
 		u64 xfeature_mask = valid & -valid;
 		int xfeature_nr = fls64(xfeature_mask) - 1;
-		void *dest = get_xsave_addr(xsave, xfeature_nr);
 
-		if (dest) {
-			u32 size, offset, ecx, edx;
-			cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, xfeature_nr,
-				    &size, &offset, &ecx, &edx);
-			if (xfeature_nr == XFEATURE_PKRU)
-				memcpy(&vcpu->arch.pkru, src + offset,
-				       sizeof(vcpu->arch.pkru));
-			else
+		cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, xfeature_nr,
+			    &size, &offset, &ecx, &edx);
+
+		if (xfeature_nr == XFEATURE_PKRU) {
+			memcpy(&vcpu->arch.pkru, src + offset,
+			       sizeof(vcpu->arch.pkru));
+		} else {
+			void *dest = get_xsave_addr(xsave, xfeature_nr);
+
+			if (dest)
 				memcpy(dest, src + offset, size);
 		}