[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzaxW-ZfOUvs--s1zt1YzTLrPWcvwG8W5FRejj1pNHWw5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:24:26 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: simplify the return expression of
bpf_object__init_maps function
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 8:21 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/9/21 4:56 AM, Wang Hai wrote:
> > There is no need for special treatment of the 'ret == 0' case.
> > This patch simplifies the return expression.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Applied to bpf-next a few days ago. Seems like patchbot was off duty
at that time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists