[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c16059d-6e58-a3e4-25ef-7e2bcabecd86@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 08:50:45 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>, pmladek@...e.com,
senozhatsky@...omium.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, john.ogness@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Move EXPORT_SYMBOL() closer to vprintk definition
On 15/06/2021 01.56, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Commit 28e1745b9fa2 ("printk: rename vprintk_func to vprintk") while
> improving readability by removing vprintk indirection, inadvertently
> placed the EXPORT_SYMBOL() for the newly renamed function at the end
> of the file.
>
> For reader sanity, and as is convention move the EXPORT_SYMBOL()
> declaration just after the end of the function.
>
> Fixes: 28e1745b9fa2 ("printk: rename vprintk_func to vprintk")
> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>
> --
> Hi,
>
> The out-of-place EXPORT_SYMBOL() caused an unexpected conflict while
> attempting to rebase the RT patches onto newer kernels.
>
> Generally I avoid sending trivial changes on their own but this one is
> a little hard to overlook. Also it felt like an obvious oversight in
> the original patch.
Yes, indeed, sorry about that, and thanks for fixing it.
> Please consider merging.
Petr, as this is causing trouble for the -rt patchset, please consider
if this could make it to Linus before v5.13 release.
Acked-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists