[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52532fa6-8883-ee5a-7047-53415f9d34f9@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:19:48 +0800
From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
<jolsa@...hat.com>, <namhyung@...nel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf annotate: Add itrace options support
Hello, Leo and Arnaldo,
On 2021/6/15 12:04, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Jihong,
>
> Loop in Adrain to be aware this AUX trace change.
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:40:36AM +0800, Yang Jihong wrote:
>> The "auxtrace_info" and "auxtrace" functions are not set in "tool" member of
>> "annotate". As a result, perf annotate does not support parsing itrace data.
>>
>> Before:
>>
>> # perf record -e arm_spe_0/branch_filter=1/ -a sleep 1
>> [ perf record: Woken up 9 times to write data ]
>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 20.874 MB perf.data ]
>> # perf annotate --stdio
>> Error:
>> The perf.data data has no samples!
>>
>> Solution:
>> 1.Add itrace options in help,
>> 2.Set hook functions of "auxtrace_info" and "auxtrace" in perf_tool.
>>
>> After:
>>
>> # perf record --all-user -e arm_spe_0/branch_filter=1/ ls
>> Couldn't synthesize bpf events.
>> perf.data
>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.010 MB perf.data ]
>> # perf annotate --stdio
>
>> Percent | Source code & Disassembly of libc-2.28.so for branch-miss (1 samples, percent: local period)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> :
>> :
>> :
>> : Disassembly of section .text:
>> :
>> : 0000000000066180 <__getdelim@@GLIBC_2.17>:
>> 0.00 : 66180: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-96]!
>> 0.00 : 66184: cmp x0, #0x0
>> 0.00 : 66188: ccmp x1, #0x0, #0x4, ne // ne = any
>> 0.00 : 6618c: mov x29, sp
>> 0.00 : 66190: stp x24, x25, [sp, #56]
>> 0.00 : 66194: stp x26, x27, [sp, #72]
>> 0.00 : 66198: str x28, [sp, #88]
>> 0.00 : 6619c: b.eq 66450 <__getdelim@@GLIBC_2.17+0x2d0> // b.none
>> 0.00 : 661a0: stp x22, x23, [x29, #40]
>
> [...]
>
> Nitpick: the above example is not typical for annotation, since it
> doesn't show any C source code with samples. At my side, I tested this
> patch and confirmed the patch works well with below commands:
>
> # gcc -ggdb -O0 -o task_migration task_migration.c
> # perf record -e cs_etm/@..._etr0/u --per-thread ./task_migration
> # perf annotate --itrace=i1000 --stdio
>
> The complete annotation result can be reviewed at [1].
>
> Thus for this patch:
>
> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
>
> [1] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/pHz74MYRPJ/
>
> [...]
> .
>
Thank you very much for the detailed testing of this patch :)
Yes, this example may not be well written.
Arnaldo, please check whether the commit message needs to be modified.
If yes, I will resubmit a new v4 patch
Thanks,
Jihong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists