lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:19:57 +0200
From:   Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dma: coherent: check no-map property for arm64

Hi Christoph,

On 14.06.2021 17:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 04:34:05PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> Looking at the rmem_dma_device_init() -> dma_init_coherent_memory(), it
>>> ends up calling memremap(MEMREMAP_WC) which would warn if it intersects
>>> with system RAM regardless of the architecture. If the memory region is
>>> nomap, it doesn't end up as IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, so memremap() won't
>>> warn. But why is this specific only to arm (or arm64)?
>> Didn't some ARMv7 implementations permit unexpected cache hits for the
>> non-cacheable address if the same PA has been speculatively fetched via the
>> cacheable alias?
> If we care about that we need to change these platforms to change the
> cache attributes of the kernel direct mapping instead of using vmap.
> We already have code to do that for openrisc, someone just needs to
> write the glue code for other platforms.

ARAIR there is a problem with changing cache attributes of the direct 
mappings on ARM 32bit. The whole lowmem is mapped with 2M 'section' 
mappings. Changing cache attributes causes 2 issues. First - one would 
need to split 2M entry into 4K entries. Second - 2M section mappings for 
the whole lowmem area are located in the per-process page tables. 
Changing the cache attributes would require locking all processes and 
iterating over their page table entries, which is a huge task.

Best regards

-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ