[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sg1hsyr7.fsf@stealth>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:52:12 +0900
From: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Move EXPORT_SYMBOL() closer to vprintk definition
Hi Petr,
Apologies for the delayed response.
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> writes:
> On Wed 2021-06-16 09:57:11, John Ogness wrote:
>> On 2021-06-16, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>> >>> Petr, as this is causing trouble for the -rt patchset, please
>> >>> consider if this could make it to Linus before v5.13 release.
>> >
>> > Punit, John, would you mind when I queue this change for-5.14? It
>> > seems that, you, RT-guys already handled this, so it will not help
>> > much if I sent it now. It does not look appropriate to send just a
>> > single cosmetic fix few days before rc7.
>>
>> Since this cosmetic problem was introduced during the 5.13 merge window,
>> it would help if it is fixed before the 5.13 release. Obviously this is
>> not a reason to have an rc7. But if there is going to be an rc7, I think
>> this fix should be included.
>
> OK, I have committed the patch into printk/linux.git, branch
> for-5.13-fixup.
>
> I am going to send the pull request later this week, most likely
> tomorrow.
Thanks for picking this up.
It's good to have to the patch go in early, but 5.14 would also be fine.
Punit
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists