lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:04:36 +0100
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
        james.quinlan@...adcom.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        etienne.carriere@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        souvik.chakravarty@....com, igor.skalkin@...nsynergy.com,
        peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com, alex.bennee@...aro.org,
        jean-philippe@...aro.org, mikhail.golubev@...nsynergy.com,
        anton.yakovlev@...nsynergy.com, Vasyl.Vavrychuk@...nsynergy.com,
        Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add transport optional
 init/exit support

Hi Jonathan,

thanks for having a look at this series.

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 02:29:56PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:59:24 +0100
> Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com> wrote:
> 
> > Some SCMI transport could need to perform some transport specific setup
> > before they can be used by the SCMI core transport layer: typically this
> > early setup consists in registering with some other kernel subsystem.
> > 
> > Add the optional capability for a transport to provide a couple of .init
> > and .exit functions that are assured to be called early during the SCMI
> > core initialization phase, well before the SCMI core probing step.
> > 
> > [ Peter: Adapted RFC patch by Cristian for submission to upstream. ]
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>
> > [ Cristian: Fixed scmi_transports_exit point of invocation ]
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> 
> Drive by comment inline.  Feel free to ignore ;)
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h |  8 ++++
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> > index 7c2b9fd7e929..6bb734e0e3ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> > @@ -321,6 +321,12 @@ struct scmi_device *scmi_child_dev_find(struct device *parent,
> >  /**
> >   * struct scmi_desc - Description of SoC integration
> >   *
> > + * @init: An optional function that a transport can provide to initialize some
> > + *	  transport-specific setup during SCMI core initialization, so ahead of
> > + *	  SCMI core probing.
> > + * @exit: An optional function that a transport can provide to de-initialize
> > + *	  some transport-specific setup during SCMI core de-initialization, so
> > + *	  after SCMI core removal.
> >   * @ops: Pointer to the transport specific ops structure
> >   * @max_rx_timeout_ms: Timeout for communication with SoC (in Milliseconds)
> >   * @max_msg: Maximum number of messages that can be pending
> > @@ -328,6 +334,8 @@ struct scmi_device *scmi_child_dev_find(struct device *parent,
> >   * @max_msg_size: Maximum size of data per message that can be handled.
> >   */
> >  struct scmi_desc {
> > +	int (*init)(void);
> > +	void (*exit)(void);
> >  	const struct scmi_transport_ops *ops;
> >  	int max_rx_timeout_ms;
> >  	int max_msg;
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> > index f15d75af87ea..20f8f0581f3a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> > @@ -1594,10 +1594,67 @@ static struct platform_driver scmi_driver = {
> >  	.remove = scmi_remove,
> >  };
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * __scmi_transports_setup  - Common helper to call transport-specific
> > + * .init/.exit code if provided.
> > + *
> > + * @init: A flag to distinguish between init and exit.
> > + *
> > + * Note that, if provided, we invoke .init/.exit functions for all the
> > + * transports currently compiled in.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on Success.
> > + */
> > +static inline int __scmi_transports_setup(bool init)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +	const struct of_device_id *trans;
> > +
> > +	for (trans = scmi_of_match; trans->data; trans++) {
> > +		const struct scmi_desc *tdesc = trans->data;
> > +
> > +		if ((init && !tdesc->init) || (!init && !tdesc->exit))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		pr_debug("SCMI %sInitializing %s transport\n",
> > +			 init ? "" : "De-", trans->compatible);
> 
> Clever formatting can makes grepping for messages harder.
> 
> Perhaps
> 		if (init)
> 			pr_debug("SCMI Initializing %s transport\n",
> 				 trans->compatible);
> 		else
> 			pr_debug("SCMI Deinitializing %s transport\n",
> 				 trans->compatible);
> 
> would be nicer even though it burns some lines. Also avoids somewhat
> ugly capitalization : De-Initializing xxx transport.
> 
> You could combine it with the convenient if(init) below
> 

Right, I'll rework to avoid issues grepping.

Thanks,
Cristian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ