[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMnkrOahSVOUCjRd@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:46:52 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 24/33] mm/swap: Add folio_rotate_reclaimable()
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:27:02AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > + !folio_unevictable(folio) && folio_lru(folio)) {
>
> Hmmm... Would folio_lru() be better named folio_on_lru()? folio_lru() sounds
> like it returns the folio's LRU.
That's folio_lru_list(). It's just that we have a bad habit of saying
"the lru" instead of "the lru list".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists