[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e68b60f-a9af-1f58-076d-1d348e3bf892@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 15:20:17 -0400
From: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: Fix fall-through warning for Clang
On 2021-06-16 4:52 p.m., Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
> the following warning by replacing a /* fall through */ comment
> with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough:
>
> rivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dce/dce_aux.c:672:4: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
> case AUX_TRANSACTION_REPLY_I2C_OVER_AUX_DEFER:
> ^
>
> Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
> implicit fall-through markings, so in order to globally enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, these comments need to be
> replaced with fallthrough; in the whole codebase.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>
Harry
> ---
> JFYI: We had thousands of these sorts of warnings and now we are down
> to just 15 in linux-next. This is one of those last remaining
> warnings.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_aux.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_aux.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_aux.c
> index 28631714f697..2fb88e54a4bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_aux.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_aux.c
> @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ bool dce_aux_transfer_with_retries(struct ddc_service *ddc,
> /* polling_timeout_period is in us */
> defer_time_in_ms += aux110->polling_timeout_period / 1000;
> ++aux_defer_retries;
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case AUX_TRANSACTION_REPLY_I2C_OVER_AUX_DEFER:
> retry_on_defer = true;
> fallthrough;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists