[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCCE8vmMJE-Y0dvGpT+1QFKVN0U9yKinF_2w+644GaXxYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:30:02 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, kishon@...com, vkoul@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add the Amlogic Meson8 HDMI TX PHY bindings
Hi Rob,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:31 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
[...]
> > +description: |+
> > + The HDMI TX PHY node should be the child of a syscon node with the
> > + required property:
> > +
> > + compatible = "amlogic,meson-hhi-sysctrl", "simple-mfd", "syscon"
>
> Is there a sub range of registers for this functionality in
> "amlogic,meson-hhi-sysctrl"? If so, please add a 'reg' property.
yes, for this part of the HHI registers there's a dedicated sub range.
I'll add a reg property with register offset and size
one question about .dts validation: at least the clock controller
(which is also a sub-node of this) does not have a dedicated sub
range.
Is it still OK in this case to set #size-cells = <1> and
#address-cells = <1> in the HHI node?
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists