[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3fsxg7tv4.fsf@t19.piap.pl>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:55:43 +0200
From: Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] membarrier: Remove arm (32) support for SYNC_CORE
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> writes:
> So it seems to come down to a question about CNS3xxx and OXNAS. If
> these aren't being used, maybe we can drop ARM11MPCore support and
> the associated platforms?
Well, it appears we haven't updated software on our Gateworks Lagunas
(CNS3xxx dual core) for 4 years. This is old stuff, pre-DTB and all. We
have replacement setups (i.MX6 + mPCIe to mPCI bridge) which we don't
use either (due to lack of interest in mPCI - the old parallel, not the
express).
I don't have a problem with the CNS3xxx being dropped. In fact, we don't
use anything (ARM) older than v7 here.
Chris.
--
Krzysztof Hałasa
Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz
Przemysłowy Instytut Automatyki i Pomiarów PIAP
Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warszawa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists