| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YMsQ82bzly2KAUsu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:08:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Use lightweight hazard pointers to grab lazy mms
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:32:15PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Here it is. Not even boot tested!
It is now, it even builds a kernel.. so it must be perfect :-)
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=sched/lazymm&id=ecc3992c36cb88087df9c537e2326efb51c95e31
Since I had to turn it into a patch to post, so that I could comment on
it, I've cleaned it up a little for you.
I'll reply to self with some notes, but I think I like it.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h | 5 ++
include/linux/sched/mm.h | 3 +
kernel/fork.c | 2 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 10 +++-
5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h
index 5d7494631ea9..ce94162168c2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h
@@ -66,4 +66,9 @@ typedef struct {
void leave_mm(int cpu);
#define leave_mm leave_mm
+/* On x86, mm_cpumask(mm) contains all CPUs that might be lazily using mm */
+#define for_each_possible_lazymm_cpu(cpu, mm) \
+ for_each_cpu((cpu), mm_cpumask((mm)))
+
+
#endif /* _ASM_X86_MMU_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
index e24b1fe348e3..5c7eafee6fea 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ static inline bool mmget_not_zero(struct mm_struct *mm)
/* mmput gets rid of the mappings and all user-space */
extern void mmput(struct mm_struct *);
+
+extern void mm_unlazy_mm_count(struct mm_struct *mm);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
/* same as above but performs the slow path from the async context. Can
* be called from the atomic context as well
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index e595e77913eb..57415cca088c 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1104,6 +1104,8 @@ static inline void __mmput(struct mm_struct *mm)
}
if (mm->binfmt)
module_put(mm->binfmt->module);
+
+ mm_unlazy_mm_count(mm);
mmdrop(mm);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 8ac693d542f6..e102ec53c2f6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <asm/switch_to.h>
#include <asm/tlb.h>
+#include <asm/mmu.h>
#include "../workqueue_internal.h"
#include "../../fs/io-wq.h"
@@ -4501,6 +4502,81 @@ prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
prepare_arch_switch(next);
}
+static void mmdrop_lazy(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *old_mm;
+
+ if (likely(!READ_ONCE(rq->drop_mm)))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Slow path. This only happens when we recently stopped using
+ * an mm that is exiting.
+ */
+ old_mm = xchg(&rq->drop_mm, NULL);
+ if (old_mm)
+ mmdrop(old_mm);
+}
+
+#ifndef for_each_possible_lazymm_cpu
+#define for_each_possible_lazymm_cpu(cpu, mm) for_each_online_cpu((cpu))
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * This converts all lazy_mm references to mm to mm_count refcounts. Our
+ * caller holds an mm_count reference, so we don't need to worry about mm
+ * being freed out from under us.
+ */
+void mm_unlazy_mm_count(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ unsigned int drop_count = num_possible_cpus();
+ int cpu;
+
+ /*
+ * mm_users is zero, so no cpu will set its rq->lazy_mm to mm.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) != 0);
+
+ /* Grab enough references for the rest of this function. */
+ atomic_add(drop_count, &mm->mm_count);
+
+ for_each_possible_lazymm_cpu(cpu, mm) {
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ struct mm_struct *old_mm;
+
+ if (smp_load_acquire(&rq->lazy_mm) != mm)
+ continue;
+
+ drop_count--; /* grab a reference; cpu will drop it later. */
+
+ old_mm = xchg(&rq->drop_mm, mm);
+
+ /*
+ * We know that old_mm != mm: when we did the xchg(), we were
+ * the only cpu to be putting mm into any drop_mm variable.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(old_mm == mm);
+ if (unlikely(old_mm)) {
+ /*
+ * We just stole an mm reference from the target CPU.
+ *
+ * drop_mm was set to old by another call to
+ * mm_unlazy_mm_count(). After that call xchg'd old
+ * into drop_mm, the target CPU did:
+ *
+ * smp_store_release(&rq->lazy_mm, mm);
+ *
+ * which synchronized with our smp_load_acquire()
+ * above, so we know that the target CPU is done with
+ * old. Drop old on its behalf.
+ */
+ mmdrop(old_mm);
+ }
+ }
+
+ atomic_sub(drop_count, &mm->mm_count);
+}
+
/**
* finish_task_switch - clean up after a task-switch
* @prev: the thread we just switched away from.
@@ -4524,7 +4600,6 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
__releases(rq->lock)
{
struct rq *rq = this_rq();
- struct mm_struct *mm = rq->prev_mm;
long prev_state;
/*
@@ -4543,8 +4618,6 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
current->comm, current->pid, preempt_count()))
preempt_count_set(FORK_PREEMPT_COUNT);
- rq->prev_mm = NULL;
-
/*
* A task struct has one reference for the use as "current".
* If a task dies, then it sets TASK_DEAD in tsk->state and calls
@@ -4574,22 +4647,16 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
kmap_local_sched_in();
fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(current);
+
/*
- * When switching through a kernel thread, the loop in
- * membarrier_{private,global}_expedited() may have observed that
- * kernel thread and not issued an IPI. It is therefore possible to
- * schedule between user->kernel->user threads without passing though
- * switch_mm(). Membarrier requires a barrier after storing to
- * rq->curr, before returning to userspace, so provide them here:
- *
- * - a full memory barrier for {PRIVATE,GLOBAL}_EXPEDITED, implicitly
- * provided by mmdrop(),
- * - a sync_core for SYNC_CORE.
+ * Do this unconditionally. There's a race in which a remote CPU
+ * sees rq->lazy_mm != NULL and gives us an extra mm ref while we
+ * are executing this code and we don't notice. Instead of letting
+ * that ref sit around until the next time we unlazy, do it on every
+ * context switch.
*/
- if (mm) {
- membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode(mm);
- mmdrop(mm);
- }
+ mmdrop_lazy(rq);
+
if (unlikely(prev_state == TASK_DEAD)) {
if (prev->sched_class->task_dead)
prev->sched_class->task_dead(prev);
@@ -4652,25 +4719,32 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
/*
* kernel -> kernel lazy + transfer active
- * user -> kernel lazy + mmgrab() active
+ * user -> kernel lazy + lazy_mm grab active
*
- * kernel -> user switch + mmdrop() active
+ * kernel -> user switch + lazy_mm release active
* user -> user switch
*/
if (!next->mm) { // to kernel
enter_lazy_tlb(prev->active_mm, next);
next->active_mm = prev->active_mm;
- if (prev->mm) // from user
- mmgrab(prev->active_mm);
- else
+ if (prev->mm) { // from user
+ SCHED_WARN_ON(rq->lazy_mm);
+
+ /*
+ * Acqure a lazy_mm reference to the active
+ * (lazy) mm. No explicit barrier needed: we still
+ * hold an explicit (mm_users) reference. __mmput()
+ * can't be called until we call mmput() to drop
+ * our reference, and __mmput() is a release barrier.
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(rq->lazy_mm, next->active_mm);
+ } else {
prev->active_mm = NULL;
+ }
} else { // to user
membarrier_switch_mm(rq, prev->active_mm, next->mm);
/*
- * sys_membarrier() requires an smp_mb() between setting
- * rq->curr / membarrier_switch_mm() and returning to userspace.
- *
* The below provides this either through switch_mm(), or in
* case 'prev->active_mm == next->mm' through
* finish_task_switch()'s mmdrop().
@@ -4678,9 +4752,19 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
switch_mm_irqs_off(prev->active_mm, next->mm, next);
if (!prev->mm) { // from kernel
- /* will mmdrop() in finish_task_switch(). */
- rq->prev_mm = prev->active_mm;
+ /*
+ * Even though nothing should reference ->active_mm
+ * for a non-current task, don't leave a stale pointer
+ * to an mm that might be freed.
+ */
prev->active_mm = NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * Drop our lazy_mm reference to the old lazy mm.
+ * After this, any CPU may free it if it is
+ * unreferenced.
+ */
+ smp_store_release(&rq->lazy_mm, NULL);
}
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 8f0194cee0ba..703d95a4abd0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -966,7 +966,15 @@ struct rq {
struct task_struct *idle;
struct task_struct *stop;
unsigned long next_balance;
- struct mm_struct *prev_mm;
+
+ /*
+ * Fast refcounting scheme for lazy mm. lazy_mm is a hazard pointer:
+ * setting it to point to a lazily used mm keeps that mm from being
+ * freed. drop_mm points to am mm that needs an mmdrop() call
+ * after the CPU owning the rq is done with it.
+ */
+ struct mm_struct *lazy_mm;
+ struct mm_struct *drop_mm;
unsigned int clock_update_flags;
u64 clock;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists