linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for XM25QH64C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f022abf3-a6fe-d060-9868-985303c4e8a0@reto-schneider.ch>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:59:19 +0200
From:   Reto Schneider <code@...o-schneider.ch>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>,
        Reto Schneider <reto.schneider@...qvarnagroup.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for XM25QH64C

Hi Michael,

Thanks for your feedback.

On 14.06.21 08:56, Michael Walle wrote:
> Could you add that as a "Datasheet:" tag before your Sob tag?

Will do for v2.

>> This chip has been (briefly) tested on the MediaTek MT7688 based GARDENA
>> smart gateway.
> 
> Could you also apply my SFDP patch [1] and send the dump? Unfortunately,
> I can't think of a good way to do that along with the patch and if this
> in some way regarded as copyrighted material. So feel free to send it to
> me privately. I'm starting to build a database.

Will do. If interested, I could also include the predecessor (XM25QH64A).

> NB. XMC ignores the continuation codes and this particular device will
> collide with M25PE64/M45PE64. Although I couldn't find any datasheet,
> so I don't know if these devices actually exist.

M25PE64 yields quite some hits on Google. Is supporting this (all?) XMC 
device in upstream a good idea nevertheless? Does "first come, first 
served" apply here?

Kind regards,
Reto